FlotillaHyves1
  • Front Page
  • Home
  • UNRWA & Refugees
    • UNRWA & Refugees 2019 >
      • UNRWA & Refugees 2018
      • UNRWA & Refugees 2017
      • UNRWA & Refugees 2016
      • UNRWA & Refugees 2015
      • UNRWA & Refugees 2014
      • UNRWA & Refugees 2013
      • UNRWA & Refugees 2012
  • Palestinian Education
    • Palestinian Education 2019 >
      • Palestinian Education 2018
      • Palestinian Education 2017
      • Palestinian Education 2016
      • Palestinian Education 2015
      • Palestinian Education 2014
      • Palestinian Education 2013
      • Palestinian Education 2012
  • Palestinian Economy
    • Palestinian Economy 2019 >
      • Palestinian Economy 2018
      • Palestinian Economy 2017
      • Palestinian Economy 2016
      • Palestinian Economy 2015
      • Palestinian Economy 2014
      • Palestinian Economy 2013
      • Palestinian Economy 2012
  • Palestinian water
    • Palestinian water 2019 >
      • Palestinian water 2018
      • Palestinian water 2017
      • Palestinian water 2016
      • Palestinian water 2015
      • Palestinian water 2014
      • Palestinian water 2013
      • Palestinian water 2012
  • Palestinian Gas
    • Palestinian Gas 2019 >
      • Palestinian Gas 2018
      • Palestinian Gas 2016/17
      • Palestinian Gas 2015
  • Internet
    • Internet 2019 >
      • Internet 2018
      • Internet 2017
      • Internet 2016
      • Internet 2015
      • Internet 2014
      • Internet 2013
      • Internet 2012
  • Fire in and across Palestine
    • Fire in and across Palestine 2019 >
      • Fire in and across Palestine 2018
      • Fire in and across Palestine 2017
      • Fire in and across Palestine 2016
      • Fire in and across Palestine 2015
      • Fire in and across Palestine 2014
      • Fire in and across Palestine 2013
  • Palestinian New Buildings
    • Palestinian New Buildings 2019 >
      • Palestinian New Buildings 2018
      • Palestinian New Buildings 2017
      • Palestinian New Buildings 2016
      • Palestinian New Buildings 2015
      • Palestinian New Buildings 2014
      • Palestinian New Buildings 2013
      • Palestinian New Buildings 2012
  • Boycott Israel
    • Boycott Israel 2019 >
      • Boycott Israel 2018
      • Boycott Israel 2017
      • Boycott Israel 2016
      • Boycott Israel 2015
      • Boycott Israel 2014
      • Boycott Israel 2013
      • Boycott Israel 2012
  • New Weapons
    • New Weapons 2019 >
      • New Weapons 2018
      • New Weapons 2017
      • New Weapons 2016
      • New Weapons 2015
      • New Weapons 2014
      • New Weapons 2013
  • Jews vs Zionism
    • Jews vs Zionism 2018 >
      • Jews vs Zionism 2017
      • Jews vs Zionism 2016
      • Jews vs Zionism 2015
      • Jews vs Zionism 2014
      • Jews vs Zionism 2013
      • Jews vs Zionism 2012
  • Breaking the Silence
    • Breaking the Silence
    • Breaking the Silence 2018
    • Breaking the Silence 2017
    • Breaking the Silence 2016
    • Breaking the Silence 2015
    • Breaking the Silence 2014
  • Church
    • Church 2019 >
      • Church 2018
      • Church 2017
      • Church 2016
      • Church 2015
      • Church 2014
      • Church 2013
      • Church 2012
  • US America
    • US America 2019 >
      • US America 2018
      • US America 2017
      • US America 2016
      • US America 2015
      • US America 2014
      • US America 2013
      • US-America 2012
  • Saudi Arabia
    • Saudi Arabia 2019 >
      • Saudi Arabia 2018
      • Saudi Arabia 2017
  • Syria
    • Syria 2019 >
      • Syria 2018
      • Syria 2017
      • Syria 2016
      • Syria 2015
      • Syria 2014
      • Syria 2013
      • Syria 2012 >
        • Syria 2012 nov
        • Syria 2012 oct
        • Syria 2012 sept
  • Egypt
    • Egypt 2019 >
      • Egypt 2018
      • Egypt 2017
      • Egypt 2016
      • Egypt 2015
      • Egypt 2014
      • Egypt 2013
  • Lebanon
    • Lebanon 2019 >
      • Lebanon 2018
      • Lebanon 2017
      • Lebanon 2016
      • Lebanon 2015
      • Lebanon 2014
      • Lebanon 2013
      • Lebanon 2012
  • Jordan
    • Jordan 2019 >
      • Jordan 2018
      • Jordan 2017
      • Jordan 2016
      • Jordan 2015
  • Iran
    • Iran 2019 >
      • Iran 2018
      • Iran 2017
      • Iran 2016
      • Iran 2015
      • Iran 2014
      • Iran 2013
      • Iran 2012
  • Iraq
    • Iraq 2019
  • Yemen
  • Turkey
    • Turkey 2019 >
      • Turkey 2018
      • Turkey 2017
      • Turkey 2016
      • Turkey 2015
      • Turkey 2014
      • Turkey 2013
      • Turkey 2012
  • Freedom Flotilla
    • Freedom Flotilla 2017-18 >
      • Freedom Flotilla 2016
      • Freedom Flotilla 2015
  • Mavi Marmara
    • Mavi Marmara 2015 >
      • Mavi Marmara 2014
      • Mavi Marmara 2013
      • Mavi Marmara 2012
      • Mavi Marmara 2011
  • UK-Britain
    • UK-Britain 2019 >
      • UK-Britain 2018
      • UK-Britain 2017
      • UK-Britain 2016
      • UK-Britain 2015
      • UK-Britain 2014
      • UK-Britain 2013
      • UK-Britain 2012
  • The Netherlands
    • The Netherlands 2018 >
      • The Netherlands 2017
      • The Netherlands 2016
      • The Netherlands 2015
      • The Netherlands 2014
      • The Netherlands 2013
      • The Netherlands 2012
  • Anti Semitism?
    • Anti Semitism? 2019 >
      • Anti Semitism? 2018
      • Anti Semitism? 2017
      • Anti Semitism? 2016
      • Anti Semitism? 2015
      • Anti Semitism? 2014
  • "Nice" Rabbis
    • "Nice" Rabbis 2019 >
      • "Nice" Rabbis 2018
      • "Nice" Rabbis 2017
      • "Nice" Rabbis 2016
      • "Nice" Rabbis 2015
      • "Nice" Rabbis 2014
      • "Nice" Rabbis 2013
      • "Nice" Rabbis 2012
      • "Nice" Rabbis 2009
  • Pictures/names of martyrs
29 june 2020
The definition of anti-Semitism weaponized for Israel's benefit
Picture
The Ryerson Centre for Free Expression hosted a virtual forum earlier this month on the definition of anti-Semitism drafted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). With governments and institutions around the world encouraged by pro-Israel groups to adopt the IHRA guidelines, four experts debated whether the IHRA definition is “fighting anti-Semitism or silencing critics of Israel”.

Professor Faisal Bhabha from Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto, and Dr Sheryl Nestel from Independent Jewish Voices Canada, argued against the definition and warned of its chilling effect on free speech. They voiced concerns over the way in which it is being weaponised by pro-Israel groups to suppress critics of the Zionist state, citing examples from Europe and America. Their interlocutors were Bernie Farber, former chief executive officer of the Canadian Jewish Congress, and Richard Marceau, Vice President at the Centre for Israel and Jewish affairs; they defended the IHRA definition as a key instrument in the fight against anti-Semitism, offering both clarity and examples as a guideline.

In the 90-minute debate Nestel, pointed out that one of the eleven examples of anti-Semitism included in the definition is to “[deny] the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g. by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour.” This, she suggested, makes her an anti-Semite under the IHRA’s definition because she believes that “Israel is a racist endeavour”. As a Jew with many holocaust survivors in the family, this is nonsensical.

The debate highlighted the complexities and confusion around this contested issue; more importantly, though, it exposed the contradictions and dangers of a definition that conflates criticism of the state of Israel with anti-Semitism in the vague and loose manner that it does. Throughout the debate, Farber and Marceau dismissed the concerns of their opponents and argued that the fearmongering by Bhabha and Nestel was exaggerated. Indeed, although one of the people who drafted the IHRA definition, American attorney Kenneth Stern, has himself warned that “right-wing Jews are weaponising” it to suppress criticism of Israel, this was dismissed by its advocates.

It was ironic, therefore, that following the debate, a prominent pro-Israel group demanded Bhabha’s expulsion from the teaching profession. The professor’s “crime”, claimed B’nai Brith Canada, was that he had made remarks about Zionism that the group deemed were beyond the pale of any academic debate. Confirming the very threat that Bhabha and Nestel had warned about so powerfully, the group launched a petition demanding Bhabha’s dismissal. B’nai Brith Canada, by the way, claims to be an advocate for human rights which, presumably, includes free speech.

The offending comments equated Zionism with white supremacy. “Zionism isn’t about self-determination,” argued Bhabha, “it’s about Jewish supremacy.” Given the history of white supremacy and the recent Black Lives Matter protests highlighting the crimes associated with racist ideology, B’nai Brith Canada’s outrage might be understandable. No one who claims any moral high ground would wish to be associated with a racist ideology that seeks the domination of one ethnic group over another.

However, ask any Palestinian if equating Zionism with white supremacy is outrageous, and I suspect that they would cite the 750,000 who were ethnically cleansed from their land by Zionists in 1948 as reason enough to make such a comparison. As is the fact that the Palestinian refugees have never been allowed to return to their homes simply because they are of a different ethnicity and will “upset” the demography of Zionist Israel. Ask the Palestinians who are confined in Bantustans and camps which are little more than open-air prisons; who can’t drive on roads built for use by Jews only, or live in modern housing settlements built for Jews only: ask them; they know a thing or two about a political ideology founded on ethnic supremacy.

Just as many white people, especially on the political right, struggle — some would say refuse — to understand the legacy of slavery and fail to grasp why protestors wish to tear down statues of slave traders, many pro-Israel groups only view Zionism through the lens of Jewish self-determination. Palestinians are absent in their victorious “reclamation” of the “land without a people for a people without a land”, one of the many Zionist myths. B’nai Brith and many such organisations seem to be completely oblivious to the fact that the story of ethnic domination and supremacy stares them in the face. As a group advocating human rights, its members would — wouldn’t they? — surely call out white supremacists who claim that their vision of North America as a representation of white self-determination is not racist. And yet they reject any such criticism of Zionist Israel.

“B’nai Brith have proven my point,” Prof. Bhabha told me. “My argument in the debate was that the IHRA definition is dangerous if adopted into law or policy, especially on university campuses, because it would result in the suppression of free speech, the demonisation of Palestinian human rights defenders, and the spread of Islamophobia.”

Repeating concerns raised during the debate about the misuse of the definition by pro-Israel groups, Bhabha explained that his comments were intended to present “different perspectives” on the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism. “The statements attributed to [me] by B’nai Brith are taken out of context for the sole purpose of distortion in order to cast aspersions on my motive and meaning. This is not surprising coming from a group that cares more about cheerleading extremist Israeli policies than about promoting equality in Canada, and which never misses an opportunity to denigrate Muslims or Arabs.”

Bhabha and Nestel’s description of the IHRA definition as a tool weaponised by Zionist groups to suppress criticism of Israel while endangering free speech cannot simply be dismissed as scaremongering, as their opponents insisted on doing during the online Ryerson debate. Rather than helping in the fight against crude anti-Semitism and protecting Jewish communities around the world, the definition’s misuse is undermining this crucial struggle by conflating criticism of the Zionist state of Israel with criticism or abuse of Jews.

Genuine anti-racists can see the flaws in adopting the IHRA definition and its examples without question. Stopping anti-Semitism should not require a blind eye to be turned to Israel’s abuse of Palestinians and their legitimate rights. If Muslims, for example, insisted that it is “Islamophobic” to criticise a Muslim country or political ideology without exception, or that criticising the serial human rights abuses of, say, Saudi Arabia, was cited in seven out of eleven examples of “Islamophobia”, I have no doubt that they would be told in no uncertain terms that such a move would be a threat to freedom of speech.

Israel does get singled out, as Bhabha and Nestel agreed, but not in the way that Zionist groups claim. Putting aside Israel’s many human rights violations and contraventions of UN Resolutions which would normally trigger the kind of sanctions we’ve seen imposed on Russia and Iran, no serious definition of racism would even contemplate putting the protection of a political entity at its core. This is the exceptionalism enjoyed by the Zionist state that is rarely, if ever, extended to anyone else. In that way, therefore, Israel does indeed get singled out for special attention.

The campaign to disqualify Bhabha from teaching is the latest example of how this privilege operates. The IHRA’s conflation of anti-Jewish racism with criticism of Israel in its definition of anti-Semitism has empowered Israel’s supporters to weaponise one of history’s ugliest forms of racism to shield the Zionist state’s ethnic domination from criticism. The Jews who suffer from anti-Semitism don’t benefit from this, Israel does, at the expense of the Palestinians whose land it occupies.

Page:  4 - 3 - 2 - 1
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.